The Award for the Best Award Show

 
 
 
 
 
Archives
 
   
January 10, 2005: The Award for the Best Award Show

Ok. I have to confess a secret. I hate award shows. Pretty soon they are going to have an award show that honors best and worst award shows. I don’t really know how people mark words, but if you know, you go ahead and mark them.

Award shows are bogus, and you know it. Just another excuse for the glitz elite to dress up and look pretty and walk carpets. And who makes the money? Stylists. Red carpet rental people. Caterers. In fact, it’s my contention, that there is some covert union of caterers, stylists, red carpet rental people, and upstart fashion designers secretly lobbying and pushing for new award shows. Always new award shows.

I don’t much understand the fascination. We reward and deify all the wrong people: singers who sing other people’s songs, actors, movie directors.

It’s no mistake that these people have more money and more resources than God. In fact I’m tired of the whole cult of stardom. There was no such thing before industrialization. I also hate it when superstars retort, “And I love you too.” Even though I’ve never met you and you mean nothing to me. Perhaps in the general sense, as an instance of their giant money-making fan base, they might, after all, love them. Just as we, the simple folk, might love getting a refund on our taxes.

What is it about the cult of stardom that is so attractive? Is it the antidote to quiet lives of desperation? Which makes us – us, the non superstars – the wax that holds the burning wick, the black infinite space sporting a few shining lights?

Yes, I know. It’s all perspective.

The covert union of caterers et al needs to create an award show for, for what, the faithful husband, the honest child, the fireman, the police officer, that woman who found $40,000 on the street and turned it into the bank, the stranger’s gentle smile which stopped a woman from her suicide plot. Of course nobody would watch that.

SS

 
     
 

You know, for no particular reason this morning, I was thinking what a lovely word pundit was and how I should work it into a conversation soon. And there it was: pundit. Fabulous word, that. The charitable donation bit is interesting thinking, kia. I hadn’t really thought that through. But yeah, what you’re saying makes sense, at least logically. On the bigger level of course it makes very little sense. But that of course is fiting. By conversation, of course, I mean here. This is the biggest conversation I’m having.

Posted by: ss at January 10, 2005 9:21 AM

The Oscars can win an Emmy? I really shouldn’t be laughing right?

Posted by: kathryn at January 10, 2005 2:46 AM

Did you know that the Oscars can win an Emmy? That’s always seemed a little incestuous to me.

Incidently, in channel surfing today I saw a program where a group of old boy news pundits were debating the amount of Tsunami relief and were actually comparing the donations of countries per capita. It left me seething and speechless at the same time.

I also wanted to note that taking a tax credit for a charitable donation is in essence negating that donation because the government is really giving back money to the donor and not to the donee. Doesn’t the money the government sends in relief come from our taxes? Or do they have the mint working extra hours, hence devaluing our dollar even more.

2 a.m and I have to be up at 7. yikes

kia

Posted by: kia at January 10, 2005 2:03 AM

I nominated the Welfare Office in Ontario for “Best PR Move Concerning One Of Your Clients” for letting the woman who should be up for “Honest Citizen of the Year” keep the 2k prize money. Did you think they were going to deduct it from her welfare cheque? I did. The cult of stardom, sadly, increases as the Cult Of Starbucks does. Somewhere there is a correlation. The covert union of caterers is in on it - this I am sure of. ;) p.s. 9|11 won for Best Movie which shocked the heck out of me. I read it on CNN. When will they have “Best Disaster” awards? rolls eyes

Posted by: kathryn at January 10, 2005 12:30 AM